<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forging Ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/256/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/256</link>
	<description>Random rants from a civil servant in Houston, TX</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DrHeinous</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/256#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>DrHeinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=256#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Tearing up Richmond will be a disaster.  Probably a good place for a rail line as any, but it will be a disaster.

Of course, something like a monorail or elevated train would seem to make a lot more sense (and work during the frequent flooding, and not get into wrecks with cars constantly).  But that's just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tearing up Richmond will be a disaster.  Probably a good place for a rail line as any, but it will be a disaster.</p>
<p>Of course, something like a monorail or elevated train would seem to make a lot more sense (and work during the frequent flooding, and not get into wrecks with cars constantly).  But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubu</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/256#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>ubu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=256#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Of course. Nobody wants the rail to run down Westpark because of demand or need!  They want it to run down Westpark because then it's not destroying their businesses, property values, or quality of life on Richmond.  Which, if the people who supposedly would stand to benefit the most from the convenience of public transport on their front doorstep don't want it, that should alert everyone as to how bad an idea it is.

Personally, I'd support just about any route, as long as they got the damn thing off ground level.  But elevated is supposedly noisy.  While that's true  for freeways, I think more could be done to quiet trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course. Nobody wants the rail to run down Westpark because of demand or need!  They want it to run down Westpark because then it&#8217;s not destroying their businesses, property values, or quality of life on Richmond.  Which, if the people who supposedly would stand to benefit the most from the convenience of public transport on their front doorstep don&#8217;t want it, that should alert everyone as to how bad an idea it is.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d support just about any route, as long as they got the damn thing off ground level.  But elevated is supposedly noisy.  While that&#8217;s true  for freeways, I think more could be done to quiet trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Simon</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/256#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=256#comment-287</guid>
		<description>This is where I rubber-stamp the post with "METRO already runs a bus down Westpark called the 9 that is never full, runs on the least frequent schedule of any route, and doesn't run on Sunday."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where I rubber-stamp the post with &#8220;METRO already runs a bus down Westpark called the 9 that is never full, runs on the least frequent schedule of any route, and doesn&#8217;t run on Sunday.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

